🎙 Listen to a summary of this story
Google is preparing to move production of its Pixel smartphones and other consumer devices out of China, marking another step in the company’s long retreat from the country as trade tensions, regulatory barriers and supply-chain risks reshape the global technology industry.
The planned manufacturing shift does not amount to a complete withdrawal from China. Google continues to maintain offices and commercial operations in the country, particularly in advertising, engineering and services for Chinese companies seeking customers overseas. However, moving hardware production would remove one of its most important remaining connections to the Chinese economy.
Google intends to transfer production of Pixel phones, smartwatches and wireless earbuds to facilities elsewhere in Asia from 2027, according to reporting discussed by Nikkei Asia. Manufacturing partners have been expanding capacity in India and Vietnam, where Google already produces some devices. The shift would reduce the company’s exposure to possible tariffs, export controls and disruptions arising from deteriorating relations between Washington and Beijing.
A retreat that began with search
Google’s difficulties in China stretch back more than two decades. The company launched a censored version of its search engine for mainland users in 2006, accepting restrictions on results as the price of entering a potentially enormous market. That compromise became increasingly difficult to defend inside and outside the company.
In 2010, Google stopped censoring its mainland search service following a sophisticated cyberattack and disputes with Chinese authorities over access to information. It redirected users to a Hong Kong-based service, although that too became difficult to reach from the mainland. By 2014, Google Search, Gmail, YouTube and several other services were largely inaccessible through China’s internet controls.
Google explored possible ways back into the search market, including a proposed censored service known internally as Dragonfly. The project attracted criticism from human rights organisations and Google employees, who argued that it could assist surveillance and suppress access to information. Google later said it had ended the initiative.
The company continued to operate a smaller Chinese business centred on advertising sales, product support and engineering. Chinese manufacturers and online retailers could buy Google advertising to reach customers abroad, even though most domestic consumers could not use the company’s principal services. Google also benefited indirectly from Android, the open-source operating system used by many Chinese smartphone manufacturers, although those devices generally rely on domestic app stores and services inside China.
Further reductions followed. Google closed its artificial intelligence research centre in Beijing and ended the mainland version of Google Translate in 2022, citing low usage. Domestic services offered by Baidu, Tencent, Alibaba and other Chinese companies had meanwhile become deeply embedded in everyday life, leaving little space for a fragmented Google ecosystem.
Manufacturing moves beyond China
The latest shift concerns where Google devices are made rather than where its digital services are sold. China built its position as the centre of global electronics manufacturing through extensive supplier networks, skilled labour and infrastructure capable of producing devices rapidly and at enormous scale. Recreating that ecosystem elsewhere is expensive and complicated.
Nevertheless, technology companies have accelerated efforts to diversify production. Pandemic-era factory closures exposed the risks of concentrating manufacturing in one country, while US restrictions on advanced technology exports and Chinese controls on strategic materials have added new uncertainties.
Vietnam has emerged as an important alternative because it already hosts a large electronics industry, including extensive operations connected to Samsung and its suppliers. Google has used the country to produce some higher-end Pixel phones and other hardware. India offers a vast workforce, government manufacturing incentives and a rapidly expanding smartphone market, although suppliers must still overcome infrastructure and logistics challenges.
Google faces fewer obstacles than Apple in making such a move because Pixel devices account for a relatively small share of global smartphone sales and are not officially sold in mainland China. Apple, by contrast, depends heavily on Chinese factories, suppliers and consumers, making any rapid relocation much more difficult.
The change reflects a broader “China plus one” strategy in which companies retain some Chinese production while developing additional capacity elsewhere. Google has not publicly described the move as a political exit, and manufacturing transfers can take years. Suppliers may also continue obtaining Chinese components even after final assembly moves to another country.
Technology rivalry narrows the relationship
Google’s shrinking role illustrates the wider fragmentation of the technology industry into increasingly separate American and Chinese spheres. China has developed domestic alternatives in search, cloud computing, social media, artificial intelligence and online commerce. Companies including Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei and ByteDance operate services designed around Chinese regulations and consumer habits.
Regulatory pressure has continued despite Google’s limited domestic reach. In February 2025, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation announced an antitrust investigation into the company shortly after new US tariffs on Chinese goods took effect. Authorities did not disclose detailed allegations, but analysts pointed to Android and Google’s licensing arrangements as possible areas of scrutiny. Google said it would cooperate with the investigation.
The inquiry demonstrated that a company does not need a popular consumer service in China to become entangled in the wider economic dispute. Android remains important to Chinese handset makers selling devices internationally, where access to Google Play and other Google services can be essential.
Google is therefore not disappearing from China altogether. Its advertising relationships, Android connections and remaining offices retain commercial value, while China’s manufacturing network will continue to influence its supply chain. The more accurate picture is one of deliberate disengagement: consumer services departed first, research activity diminished later and hardware manufacturing is now following.
For Beijing, the trend highlights the cost of technological separation even as domestic companies gain market share. For Google, it represents an effort to protect production from geopolitical shocks and place future investment in markets where its services can operate more freely. What began as a dispute over censored search results has evolved into a broader restructuring of where American technology is developed, manufactured and sold.
